Consequently, we see the innovations reflected in the review.

Also, in my scientific work, I want to consider the legal precedent of a high-profile case against YUKOS. To begin with, it is worth noting that Mikhail Khodorkovsky was still guilty, as he himself stated in an interview with the famous blogger Yuri Dudya. But we will not consider this side of the issue, of course, that the YUKOS enterprise itself as a legal entity will serve as "food for the mind" , and the identity of the CEO who appeared in the case as an individual. In other words, we will consider the legal and economic side of the object, and we will not touch on politics.

In 1996, compared with other oil state giants, the company was still in a satisfactory condition – according to Khodorkovsky himself. Nevertheless, oil production fell by 15% a year, debts to all contractors amounted to about $3 billion, salary delays reached six months, workers either rebelled, stole, or muttered. In 2003, salaries already reached 30,000 rubles a month, there was no question of any delays in payments, and tax revenues to budgets of all levels were already $3.5-4 billion/year – moreover, with the oil price at $27-30 per barrel, not $60. That is, thanks to privatization, real management was created, which simply did not exist in the era of "beautiful directors". Consequently, the above suggests that the company's debts continued to grow..

 According to Mikhail Khodorkovsky: 12 theses of perestroika led to the following factors:

1. qualitative strengthening of the role of states as regulators in the economy; 2. the ghost of regulatory systems in accordance with the requirements of the global economy and the equilibrium of all its subjects; 3. the revival of the values of solidarity as an alternative to economic selfishness and uncontrolled competition; 4. introduction of stricter requirements for the ownership and management of corporations by the state and society; 5. a new financial market management system and regulation of these markets, which will shift the balance of their activities towards the socially necessary goal of supporting the development of the real economy; 6. limiting the growth of material consumption of the "golden billion", which has recently become simply unrestrained; 7. accelerated development and implementation of specific technologies to reduce the consumption of non-renewable natural resources; 8. partial restoration of the rights of values and with.9. Definition of restrictions on the order of movement of capital, goods and labor between large economic zones (regions), preventing the possibility of sudden catastrophic fluctuations; 10. the growing attention of national governments and interstate regulators to the creation of effective social "airbags"; 11. the growing share of the human factor and intelligence in the economy, which will no longer be able to exploit various objective trends without a subjective, creative and critical approach to them; 12. the relegation to the background of the logic of the priority of commercial profit, – economic egoism "Program 2020", – According to Mikhail Borisovich, set out in the book "articles, dialogues, interviews" is as follows:

The political and economic program of the future ruling elite of Russia is designed for 12 years. The objectives of this program, which can be implemented in its main provisions by 2020, were as follows: 1. the increase in the population of the Russian Federation to 220-230 million people – this was supposed to allow the development of Eastern Siberia and the Far East by the forces of the Russian people, as well as to avoid the dismemberment of the country as a result of the "capitalization" of the eastern regions. 2. achieving the structure of the national economy: 40% – "knowledge economy"; 40% – oil, gas, metal, licensed production; 20% – agricultural, including processing and trade. 3. Preservation of the territory of the Russian Federation and consolidation of its current borders, including through the power of implementing colossal investment programs in the Far East and Eastern Siberia. 4. The creation of new Russian armed forces practices from scratch. 5. Reconstruction of fundamental science and system education as a structure of reproduction of intellectual national potential.