We know from practice that consciousness is not manifested at the children in the case of absence of live conversation with him in the childhood of other people. Really, communication from the perspective of filing at first to the child of voice and iconic information, which is clear for him so as it is connected to meal, walks, entertainments, etc., gradually creates at him ability of understanding environmental and ability to operate according to this understanding. To do this he initially did not even need to talk. The main thing is the fact that he on examples from adults learns to select from surrounding only those data which he can decrypt and interpret. If the similar information channel is absent, the child can't "reach" human "now" and he remains in time of the living being which doesn't have self-consciousness, for which the actions based generally on reflexes and instincts are characteristic.

It is known that the person, the long time remaining in perfect loneliness without information influx enough quickly runs wild or, as speak, "goes crazy". There is it besides because "now" of the person is formed by copies of the same external. There is only information from within as the form of some memories as well as instinctive and reflex responses for his consciousness. As a result, "now" is slowed down that is manifested in the actual stop of time for him, and the person turns into the being possessing only by primary instincts and reflexes.

Now consciousness in representation of science is considered secondary, a consequence of natural processes. As you can see, everything occurs on the contrary: the unidirectional change of beingness as conjoint complex of the material objects, space and time happens in case of constant involvement of consciousness. Absence of consciousness in beingness means the actual absence of beingness so as even if to assume existence of such beingness, who will be able grasp this beingness, so no matter is it or not, this will still remain unknown to anyone, because that someone doesn't exist. And, on the contrary: without support on beingness consciousness is lost as there are not apps for it, or there is nothing to do to it. Such consciousness, which is nothing to do, can't be. About what development of consciousness it is possible to speak here?

The material beingness in the infinite variety is always together with the material echelon – by consciousness, without which this variety couldn't be manifested. The term "always" means that outside duration the consciousness isn't present, hence, there is no beingness also. Therefore a condition of their coexistence is time. In its finite duration the consciousness only and is capable to interact with remaining beingness, to open it as consciousness can until, and reveal itself into it in the changes.

Thus, not "the thing in itself (the transcendental object)” is outside any thinking" as Kant [3] claimed, but both material objects – a thing and consciousness – only and coexist really in the interaction so as not consciousness in itself only influences on itself and surrounding it, but and the thing always influences on consciousness. This mutual influence means that the friend without friend they are lost. Therefore Fichte's thought: "I do myself: own beingness by means of the thinking … I – it is unconditional, is own creation" [4], is correct only half. Without support of consciousness on remaining beingness consciousness can create nothing, including itself. Though, certainly, it is difficult to deny the leading role of consciousness in the process of interaction.