Where (42) is used for the lightest particle of all the obtained reaction products in the set (43); for all intermediate reaction products (44) on the set (45) with its conditions; for the heaviest particle (46) on the scale of the set (47).
By definition, the value of the outgoing Coulomb barrier, as can be seen, is described as the energy that the outgoing particles acquire, pushing off from each other, immediately after overcoming the nuclear forces and before decreasing with increasing distance between them, and therefore each of the particles receives this energy, due to which, if the kinetic energy formulas of light reaction products are practically not If they change, then for heavy particles formulas (37—39) acquire a new form in (48—50).
But before continuing the analysis, it is worth considering the case when the formed core may be radioactive.
In this case, it is worth analyzing the reaction of the form (51).
Exactly as the analysis was carried out for reaction (1), a similar algorithm is carried out for reaction (51), but, of course, the Coulomb barrier is not determined, since there is no directed particle for this reaction, therefore the yield of this reaction (52) is determined, and then the kinetic energy for all reaction products (53).
And one of the final points of the analysis of the decay reaction is the indication of the law of nuclear decay (54).
In this case, a certain stable nucleus and light particles are obtained, with a certain kinetic energy and a known velocity (55).
If the real core is radioactive again, although such cases are quite rare, the same algorithm for analyzing decay reactions works for them. In this case, each of the particles will also repel, receiving an additional outgoing Coulomb barrier, which is taken into account.
In this case, for the nucleus, the kinetic energy and the temperature generated from it are explained by means of the already derived patterns for the formed part (56) and for the entire target (57), and for light particles, the kinetic energy is known, as well as the charge through (58) and current (59).
However, this does not end the analysis of the reaction, since only one channel of the nuclear reaction has been analyzed, which means that it is worth paying special attention to all possible different combinations (60).
In this case, all possible variations of nuclear reaction channels are expressed as a matrix product, however, of course, most of them, especially those associated with heavy nuclei, are unlikely, but even this is not a complete list, since there are also reactions when the kinetic energy of directed particles becomes sufficient to create new particles. In addition, do not forget the cases when the output of particles increases, that is, 3, 4, etc. are already formed. the products of nuclear reactions, but only for their recording it was already necessary to use complex n-dimensional matrices.
Therefore, in practice, only the most probabilistic ones are left (61).
So, if the moment of formation of new particles is not taken into account, most often cases of the formation of an integral nucleus, the formation of a proton, neutron, electron, positron, deuteron, triton or other similar particles are taken (61). For each of these reactions, the output of the nuclear reaction channel is calculated for all possible enumerated combinations, unlike multidimensional cases and particle formation (62) and for more probabilistic channels of the nuclear reaction (63), along with the threshold of the nuclear reaction channel also for absolutely all cases except the above (64) and more probabilistic channels presented (65).