Jacques de Billy, 1670

Priest and Professor of Mathematics

In the content of the book is presented the main theme consisting of about three tens items. This would be nothing special if all these items did not contain … the most real and incredibly loud sensations! But to say only this about this book would be to say nothing about it. Alone only illustration of the real (!) text in the margins of a missing book (see Pic. 5) we have restored, can cause a real shock among experts of the main theme! They might think: "Is this really the same book with Pierre Fermat's notes in the margins?". But no, this book is not yet available. And since we still managed to find out, what was actually written in its margins where Fermat's Last Theorem should be located, we depicted this recording by all means available to us. If we compare this restored text with the one that was published back in 1670 (see Pic. 3), then it becomes obvious that these are completely different recordings!

However, in our time, the Internet is also literally flooded with heart-rending screaming headlines about some sensations, which in fact are not, and their distributors resort to them only to raise the statistics of browsing. When it comes to science, if there are really sensations, then only in doses that cannot be captured by any statistics. The problem here is that the evaluations in the headlines are given by the distributors of information themselves who obviously should not be trusted. As for the content of this book, the situation here is principally different, since all the data here, assessments and conclusions can be checked by the most objective and incorruptible judge i.e. a regular calculator and anyone can always refer to it.

In particular, if there is a suspicion that the restored Fermat’s record on the margins is nothing more than another fake among the sea of any other ones, they will prove to be not only nonconstructive, but also rejecting the opportunity itself to find out the real solution of the famous scientific problem. If this factor is not taken into account, then those who persist in such suspicions risk being in a very stupid position, since in this restored recording there is exactly what science still had no idea about. In fact, for science the FLT has always been just a puzzle, which for more than three centuries, could not be solved.

Such a scornful attribution of one of the fundamental scientific problems to the sphere of intellectual entertainment led to the fact that real science began to give way to ideas that have nothing to do with it. As a result, it turned out that all reference books and encyclopedias in unison and categorically tell us that the FLT problem has long been solved, but in fact science has no idea about how things really are. If this were indeed the case, the consequences would be so significant that they would radically change the state of all science in general as a whole!!!

Are you not believe? Well, judge for yourself, here is just one of these consequences. If the FLT is proven i.e. the solution in integers of the Fermat equation a^>n+b^>n=c^>n for n>2 is impossible, this equation turns out to be the only (!!!) exception from the more general case A^>x+B^>y=C^>z in which for any (!!!) given natural numbers x, y, z except of course x=y=z>2 may be calculate any number (!!!) of solutions in integers! And what now? Does science know, how to solve this general equation? Of course, no. Or perhaps science at least knows something about Fermat’s equations for children with magic numbers? Or about the wonderful Fermat’s binomial formula? Also no. However, the Soviet science fiction writer Alexander Kazantsev somehow incredibly way guessed about this formula, but mathematicians could not help him to derive it, so instead of a spectacular equation (see Pic. 1), he had to demonstrate an empty dummy.