As for the antiproton – this is very important. If there is an antiproton, why shouldn't there be an "anti" of all elements? Now we ask ourselves: what kind of world would they then put together? Or – what kind of world are they stable in? Like all the other elements in ours? An anti-world? An opposite one? Parallel? Since all the other qualities are the same. Does that make sense? We don't know what worlds are out there. If we have found here with the help of science what was thought to be magic, i.e. substance with opposite qualities, the same antiproton, why not assume that everything is the same there, but at the same time a little different. For example, other understandings of the sensible. Like in a mirror: you see yourself – and everything seems to be normal. Or as with a thought and its illiterate translation into a text: everything is clear in your head, but in writing – only you alone understand what you wanted to say, while for others it is just mistakes and a set of words. Participants of the first flights, flights of consciousness, will have to know science. They must understand where they are going to end up. This will shape their thoughts – and consciousness will be different, that is, the influence of consciousness on the particles will be kind of intellectual. Consequently, the probability that they will end up in a similarly intelligent world will be high. Well, imagine if they end up in a wild bandit world. Can you imagine how that would affect us?

Chapter 9. Cloning is no longer a secret

It is no secret that throughout human history, information and knowledge have been the most important weapon and value. They have been killed for them, hidden, paid for, organized alliances and waged wars.

Believe me, the level of science that you know, even though it is overwhelming for some, is already yesterday's day for secret groups (and these can be outwardly official associations), and sometimes the Stone Age. Or almost. For example, what would you say if I told you about the possibility of creating a copy of a living being at a time when only such developments were carried out in closed laboratories?

It all started when Theodore Schwann formulated the cell theory. And it was as early as 1838-1839. Then Rudolf Virchow, in 1855, supplemented it with the crucial statement: "every cell is derived from another cell." Hans Dreischau in 1892 divided a four-cell sea urchin embryo into separate cells. Each of the divided cells grew into a normal larva. In 1901, Hans Spiman successfully performed similar experiments on frog embryos consisting of 16 blastomeres cells. In the 40s of the XX century, cloning experiments began in the USSR. In 1943, the first successful fertilization of an egg cell in a test tube was reported in the journal Science. In 1944, John Rocke and Miriam Menkin (USA) performed the first in vitro fertilization of human oocytes.

And then the pace didn't slow down.

In 1977, scientists at Oxford University became interested in cloning organisms, and under the guidance of Professor of Zoology J. Gerdon, more than 50 frogs were produced by cloning. In 1984, the whole world was shocked by the news that a cloned lamb was born in the laboratory of Steen Willadsen from the embryonic cells of an immature sheep.

I won't go on, you will find a lot of information on this topic yourself and even that secret laboratories are training armies of cloned soldiers. Of course we will smile, but it's not really funny.

Cloning is no longer a secret. If it is classified, and logically it is, all secret things are revealed; information is already being revealed about how to download your digital copy through your brain and put your image into a clone. You will say: nonsense and fantasy. And I will answer you: you will live and work in this system. If even a hundred years ago you were explained the possibilities of your smartphone, you would not only be shocked, no, you wouldn't even be able to understand what they are talking about.