Starting September, the service learning format has been piloted at a hundred universities. NGOs and social enterprises now have the opportunity to present their project assignments directly to universities or through the website of the Association of Volunteer Centers at Dobro.ru.[28]
Are these three directions the same in the foreign universities, or do they have something that Russian higher learning institutions do not have? Both foreign and Russian universities largely pursue similar objectives within the context of the third mission. For example, a prevalent area within the third mission involves contributing to the resolution of socially significant challenges through the integration of modern technology solutions. These projects can be projects in areas like environment or developing assistive technologies for the handicapped, to name a few. Projects like this can be found in both foreign and Russian universities.
While Russia rightfully boasts its universities that rank near the top of the global scale in many aspects, the extent to which the third mission mechanisms are implemented in different Russian universities varies by several orders of magnitude. This split is clearly greater than the overall gap between leading Russian and foreign universities in this regard.
You mentioned the universities having the capacity to act as think tanks. How is this achieved in practice? Many of the strongest universities are contracted by government authorities, major corporations, development institutions, and charitable foundations to do research, analytical work, and provide consulting services. They also collaborate partner with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in implementing grant projects. Some of these initiatives are conducted pro bono or as part of government assignments.
At the federal level, institutions like the Higher School of Economics, the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow State University, and the Finance Academy traditionally serve as leading expert organizations for the presidential administration, the government, and various federal ministries.
Some regional universities are also actively involved in analytical activities, such as Ural Federal University, Far Eastern Federal University, etc.
They serve as hubs attracting high-level experts and analysts with experience in both business and public service. Consequently, the practice of engaging universities in the development of conceptual documents for cities and regions is gaining traction.
What other contributions can universities make to the socio-economic development of their regions as part of their third mission?
In addition to acting as think tanks, one other notable approach is the cluster model, where universities can play an enhanced role in driving technological advancements in their regions. These clusters bring together businesses, research institutions, educational organizations, and development institutions.
In both Russian and foreign practice, universities often serve as the central organizations within these clusters. For instance, the D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology is the central organization of the “Green Moscow” interdisciplinary cluster,[29] with the status of an innovative science and technology center. The university has also established an advanced engineering school as part of the cluster.
The Russian Ministry of Education and Science is actively promoting the creation of scientific and educational centers within several universities. These initiatives showcase the diversity of formats through which universities can harness their potential for regional development, with diverse contribution to socio-economic growth.