4. Kerimov D.A. O vseobshchej teorii gosudarstva i eyo metodologii [The Universal Theory of the State and its Methodology]. Vestnik BIST (Bashkirskogo instituta social’nyh tekhnologij) – Vestnik BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies). 2011. Issue 4. P. 10–18. (In Russ.).

5. Kolodub G.V. Znachenie ucheniya o pravovoj metodologii pri obosnovanii voprosa isklyuchitel’nosti metodologii nauki grazhdanskogo prava [The Value of the Doctrine of Legal Methodology when Justifying Exclusiveness of Methodology of Civil Law Science]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2015. Issue 3(29). P. 100–106. (In Russ.)

6. Komissarova E.G. Vliyanie metodologii na vybor metodov issledovaniya v civilistike. [The Influence of Metodology the Choice of Research Methods in Civil Law]. Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovanij: sbornik nauchnyh statej pod red. A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O.A. Kuznetsova – Methodological Problems of Civil Law Studies: collected articles; ed. by A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O.A. Kuznetsova. Moscow, 2016. P. 89–108. (In Russ.).

7. Kotyurova M.P. Avtoreferat dissertacii yurista: “klipovoe” myshlenie i rechevye pogreshnosti [Abstract of Dissertation of the Lawyer: Clip-thinking and Speech Error]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2010. Issue 17. P. 49–53. (In Russ.)

8. Krivoruchenko V.K. Ot tradicii k novatorstvu. avtoreferat dissertacii: kakim emu byt’? [From Tradition to Innovation, the Dissertation: What it Should Be?]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshej shkoly) – Alma mater (Higher school messanger). 2008. Issue 11. P. 13–21. (In Russ.)

9. Kunicyn A.S. Voprosy metodologii nauchnyh issledovanij v rossijskoj yuridicheskoj klassike. [Issues of Methodology of Scientific Researches in Russian Legal Classics]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2011. Issue 12(180). P. 92–101. (In Russ.)

10. Reshetov Yu.S., Voronin M.V. Razvitie sistemnogo pravovogo znaniya kak faktor dinamiki sovremennoj pravovoj metodologii [Development of the Systemic Legal Knowledge as a Factor of Contemporary Legal Methodology Dynamics]. Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovanij: sbornik nauchnyh statej pod red. A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O.A. Kuznetsova – Methodological Problems of Civil Law Studies: collected articles; ed. by A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O.A. Kuznetsova. Moscow, 2016. P. 127–143. (In Russ.)

11. Serova O.A. Problemy novizny nauchnyh issledovanij. [The Problem of Novelty of Research]. Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovanij: sbornik nauchnyh statej pod red. A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O. A. Kuznetsova – Methodological Problems of Civil Law Studies: collected articles; ed. by A.V. Gabov, V.G. Golubtsov, O. A. Kuznetsova. Moscow, 2016. P. 155–171. (In Russ.)

12. Sinchenko G.Ch. Bezlichnye, neopredelenno-lichnye i lichnye sintaksicheskie konstrukcii v rechevom povedenii dissertanta. [Impersonal, Indefinitepersonal and Personal Syntax in the Verbal Behavior of the Dissertation]. Nauchnyj vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii – Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia. 2008. Issue 4. P. 30–34. (In Russ.)

13. Chekhovich Yu.V. Ob obnaruzhenii zaimstvovanij pri ehkspertize nauchnyh statej. [About Wrongful Appropriations Detection when Conducting Expert Reviewing of Scientific Articles].