When in August 1485 Henry VII (1485–1509) became king it was by no means the dawn of a new age. For men at the time it merely marked yet another twist of fate. Half a century later the perception of the event radically changed: it was viewed as the beginning of a new era. That was due to two things: the success of Tudor rule and the promotion by the family itself of the idea. Actually, the reign of Henry VII was a continuation of what had gone before. It was a reversion to Edward IV. Henry VII, however, had industry, patience, powers of organization and a firm belief in the splendor of the crown. Under him that conviction was to increase, as a compensation for what he lacked most, a good claim to the throne. It was this lack of a good claim that made him start the long process of eliminating rival claimants and deliberate distancing of the monarchy from the nobility. As the victor at Bosworth, Henry was able to pass acts of attainder and thus took over his enemies’ estates, and held on to them. So many lords had been killed in the Wars of the Roses, or had lost their lands to the crown, that with the Commons’ support Henry was able to destroy their power for ever. Now the lords were forbidden by law to keep any armed followers. The royal court of the Star Chamber was given power to deal severely with any rich man who wronged his poorer neighbors. The feudal basis of society was broken completely. Henry often preferred to employ his own well-educated and trusted officials instead of noblemen. The noble families didn’t disappear, but they mixed more freely with the commercial and professional classes. Their younger sons often became merchants and lawyers.

The keynote of Tudor rule was the concentration of power in the hands of the dynasty. This changed the nature of power: it was no longer supported by armed retainers, but exercised instead through wealth and political influence at court. Men now attached themselves to a great lord who enjoyed the king’s favor. Attendance at court and an office in the household became the summit of ambition for the aristocracy. The Tudor kings saw this as a means of control and elaborated the role of the king, one already mystical in the Middle Ages, so that by the close of the 16th century the ruler enjoyed almost semi-divine status.

It was during Henry’s reign that the centre of regal power became based in the Council. This consisted of up to a hundred and fifty councillors in all: peers, lawyers, household officials and clergymen. The monarchy also needed support throughout the country and many of the councillors occupied key posts outside London. But far more important was the enhanced status given to members of the gentry, who were appointed by the crown as Justices of the Peace. Throughout the century of Tudor rule they were fundamental instruments for the execution of royal policy in the countryside. The Tudors were brilliant at going with the grain, rarely asking officials to carry out a policy to which there was overwhelming opposition.

Henry VII followed Edward IV in sharing a firm belief that sound finances were one of the keys to successful rulership. Although he died only just solvent, that in itself was a major and rare feat, achieved through receiving income from crown lands, customs and fees. He avoided expensive foreign wars, trade flourished. Instead of fighting he married his children to the royal families of Scotland and Spain. In Henry’s new national state there was no need for an army, for he ruled with popular approval. Except in the first few years of his rule, he made little use of Parliament and ruled through his council instead. It was possible only because he was a good businessman.